The marketing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the psychopharmacological industry presents a serious moral problem for the corporate model of medicine. In this paper I examine ethical ...
Correspondence to Dr Rosalind J McDougall, Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne 3010, Victoria, Australia; rmcdo{at}unimelb.edu.au Young ...
Correspondence to Andreas Albertsen, School of Business and Social Sciences: Department of Political Science, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Midtjylland, Denmark; aba{at}ps.au.dk While COVID-19 vaccines ...
In a forthcoming book titled The Emerging Tradition of Secular Bioethics , we take up Parker’s timely question, ‘How should the role(s) of bioethics be understood in the context of a world of intense ...
Pregnancy has a profound impact on individuals’ lives, yet the subjective experience is often absent from the discourse on reproductive rights and ethics. Although pregnancy is an epistemically ...
We use ‘Javanese philosophical ethics’ to refer to widely noted patterns in ethical thought that emphasize harmony, duty, and acceptance as foundations for living. In traditional Javanese thought, ...
In response to the Cass Review, Giordano offers a vital critique of how clinical trials have been framed as a precondition for access to puberty blockers for trans youth in England.1 Giordano ...
In ‘Digital Twins for Trans People in Healthcare: Queer, Phenomenological and Bioethical Considerations’,1 we examine the use of digital twin (DT) technology for transgender individuals. Our central ...
In the feature article, ‘Bioethics and the value of disagreement’, Professor Parker proposes a new framework that integrates adversarial collaboration from the sciences and antagonistic cooperation ...
Michael Parker’s novel recommendation1 for bioethicists to embrace adversarial cooperation (AC) to address deep value disagreements is both welcome and refreshing. However, the prerequisites for the ...
Parker’s vision of ‘adversarial cooperation’1 offers a compelling framework for navigating moral disagreement in pluralistic societies, emphasising the need for bioethical expertise grounded in ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback